Proceeding contribution from Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
I have always had a fairly radical view about this. I do not think anyone could work in health or social care without having the attributes of treating people with dignity and respect. If an issue arises, I do not think the quality account is the way for redress, but it provides information to the users of the service. Ultimately, any health or social care provider is accountable to its local population. If that information is captured through an independent assessment of the patient experience, where dignity and respect had been challenged in a provider, there are two ways patients can exercise their choice, but the complaint element could be addressed through other mechanisms.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c191GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Accountability Administration Health services Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Patients Public consultation Primary care trusts National Institute for Health and Care Excellence MRSA Standards Safety Care Quality Commission National Quality Board
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:22:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531963
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531963
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531963