Proceeding contribution from Lord Darzi of Denham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 26 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
Health Bill [HL]
I am grateful for that clarification. Essentially, the noble Lord is asking whether a commissioner should have a quality account. The answer to that is that it should not have a quality account. There is a framework for assessing the quality of commissioning, which is the world-class commissioning framework. There is an assurance exercise that PCTs are going through. To reassure the noble Lord, there are now indicators looking at the performance of commissioning, which is something about which many noble Lords here have expressed concern. To be fair to the PCTs, as I said before, they are two and a half years old. We have in place the indicators that the noble Lord is referring to. It would be interesting to link the performance of the PCTs with the performance of their providers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c195GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Accountability Administration Health services Hygiene Infectious diseases NHS Patients Public consultation Primary care trusts National Institute for Health and Care Excellence MRSA Standards Safety Care Quality Commission National Quality Board
- Legislation
- Health Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:33:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531979
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531979
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531979