Proceeding contribution from Baroness Jay of Paddington (Labour) in the House of Lords on Friday, 27 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords Bill [HL].
House of Lords Bill [HL]
My Lords, I apologise to my noble friend, but I wonder whether he can help me on this. He was encouraging in response to my specific point about taxation and the need to establish different criteria on membership. He is now, as I understand it, also suggesting that the Government wish to take action on criminal activities and other, possibly exclusionary, difficulties that prohibit membership. How do those matters, if they are put in a collective basket, not inhibit the kind of long-term reform that he says is the Government’s aim? That is the basis, as I understand it, for his opposing the position that many of us have taken, which is that we need this incremental reform now.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 708 c491
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal records Accountability Age Costs Attendance By-elections Elections House of Lords Eligibility Disqualification Hereditary peers European Parliament members Public appointments Northern Ireland Assembly National Assembly for Wales Peers Life peers Reform Scottish Parliament Retirement Appointments Commission
- Legislation
- House of Lords Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:50:20 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532548
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532548
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_532548