Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nick Gibb (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 March 2009. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Primary School Places (London).


Primary School Places (London)

I congratulate the hon. Member for Kingston and Surbiton (Mr. Davey) on securing this debate and on his accurate analysis of the process of building new school capacity, which is Kafkaesque in its bureaucratic complexity and contradictions. That is something that the Conservative party policy would sweep away as we sought to implement a Swedish approach to bringing in new education providers. In this country, the school admissions process and securing a place at either a primary or a secondary school for a child has become a fraught, highly stressful annual moment for parents. With one in three primary schools judged by Ofsted to be no better than satisfactory, it is clear why school admissions is such a sensitive issue: it is trying to squeeze a pint into a half-pint pot. Last week I visited King Solomon academy, which my hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Mr. Field) mentioned. It has an excellent primary school and is one of the schools rated by Ofsted as outstanding. However, the problem in Kingston and Surbiton seems to be one of poor forecasting rather than the quality of the primary schools. Plans were not put in place to raise capacity when the demographics were relatively clear that new capacity was needed, notwithstanding the recent trends arising from the recession.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
488 c225WH 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Admissions Construction Buildings Capital investment Class sizes Finance Greater London Local government Private education Local government finance Public consultation Primary education Migration Statistics Standards Schools Temporary accommodation
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk