Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Representation of the People (Amendment) Regulations 2009.


Representation of the People (Amendment) Regulations 2009

I admire the noble Lord’s resilience in these matters. I offer an apology in that I had assumed that we were debating all three statutory instruments together. That is why I made my remarks about data sharing, which are possibly more appropriate to these regulations than to the preceding ones. I have nothing further to add other than that I am interested in his estimates of the number of Peers who might be affected by this measure. I think he said originally that four Peers might be affected, and then suggested that the figure was coming down to a much smaller one. I remember that a Secretary of State in the Department for Education for whom I worked said that she thought three exam boards were too many and that one was too few. However, she was not prepared to speculate on what she considered was the right figure. I wonder whether the noble Lord will speculate on what the appropriate figure—if it is much smaller than four—is likely to be. He probably cannot answer that question and I do not particularly expect one. However, if he can, I will listen to it with interest.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c317-8GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Data protection Elections Electoral register European Parliament Peers Overseas residence
Legislation
Representation of the People (Amendment) Regulations 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk