Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (Tribunal Composition) Order 2009.


Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (Tribunal Composition) Order 2009

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the order. We understand that it represents a shift towards a less rigid adjudication of holiday-pay disputes. As such, I cannot see that we would have a major problem with it. However, I will ask a few general questions. The 2007 Gibbons review made 17 recommendations. Will the Minister say which of these have been implemented to date? The Gibbons review found that the average cost to a business of defending an employment tribunal claim was £9,000. In the light of this significant figure, what plans have the Government to address the problem of vexatious claims, particularly against small businesses that can ill afford them? The noble Baroness will be aware that the Federation of Small Businesses has called for a moratorium on the implementation of new employment laws due to come into force on 6 April, until the next implementation date of 1 October. The federation says that these laws could cost small businesses nearly £800 million a year and will put more financial pressure on already struggling companies. The FSB is concerned that firms will be unable to retain staff—or employ extra staff—if they are burdened with such new legislation. Have the Government met the FSB to discuss its request, or have they given it any consideration; and if so, what is the likely outcome?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c73-4 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Costs Employment Employment Tribunals Service Judges Holidays Pay Tribunals Small businesses
Legislation
Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (Tribunal Composition) Order 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk