Proceeding contribution from Baroness Jay of Paddington (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on House of Lords Bill [HL].
House of Lords Bill [HL]
I hope that my noble friend will not regard this as nit-picking but, in response to various questions and comments, he has said that the Government effectively support three of the four points. As my noble friend Lord Grocott says, that amounts to a three-quarter endorsement of the Bill. Yet I understand that what he is saying about proposed subsection (d) of the new clause, which would, ""enable the House to exclude Members from the House"," is that the Government are looking more urgently than considering the general points of the White Paper at perhaps bringing legislation forward before the general election. Will he be kind enough to confirm that, if possible? If that is so, and all he is saying is that he cannot accept the provision on the hereditary Peers, why is it not possible to take any potential immediate action to include some of the other points proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Steel?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c424-5
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- By-elections House of Lords Eligibility Hereditary peers Public appointments Peers Life peers Appointments Commission
- Legislation
- House of Lords Bill (HL) 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:14:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540594
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540594
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540594