Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 March 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on House of Lords Bill [HL].


House of Lords Bill [HL]

I do not think that the noble Lord is being disingenuous, but if he looks at the actual Bill, Clause 2(4) refers to, ""members affiliated with registered political parties"." That includes the great majority of this House. The White Paper made it clear that the political parties would have a role and that it would be on grounds of probity alone, as the noble Lord, Lord Norton, said, that the statutory Appointments Commission would have a role. It will not be selecting members of the Labour Party or the Conservative Party—neither party would put up with that. That is very clear. I hope that I can find a softer word than "disingenuous" to suggest that the noble Lord’s is not a reasonable critique of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c435 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
By-elections House of Lords Eligibility Hereditary peers Public appointments Peers Life peers Appointments Commission
Legislation
House of Lords Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk