Proceeding contribution from Pat McFadden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 March 2009. It occurred during Legislative debate on Legislative Reform.
Legislative Reform
On a procedural point, the hon. Gentleman heard my hon. Friend the Member for Ellesmere Port and Neston (Andrew Miller) say that the Committee has a stronger power, which is to recommend that the measure be vetoed. Members of the Committee are in the Chamber, so they can correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that the Committee did not use that power because its concerns were not about the substance of what we were trying to do. In those circumstances, bringing the order to the House is not to railroad the House. If there are concerns, a perfectly proper response is to have a debate about them. I have tried to respond to the concerns of the Committee today. That is not railroading or steamrollering; it is perfectly in line with the proper procedures of the House.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 489 c1085
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Advertising Costs Insolvency Internet Newspaper press Publicity Local press Legislative reform orders London Gazette
- Legislation
- Legislative Reform (Insolvency) (Advertising Requirements) Order 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:34:20 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540696
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540696
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540696