Proceeding contribution from Andrew Miller (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 March 2009. It occurred during Legislative debate on Legislative Reform.
Legislative Reform
I have just been reflecting on my right hon. Friend's earlier comments; I apologise for going back a paragraph in his notes. He was talking about the narrow nature of the order and he has acknowledged that there will be another order. The hon. Member for Weston-super-Mare (John Penrose) made a perfectly reasonable point in asking why there could not have been a single order. If there had been, we would have had a clearer picture of the Government's strategy. I do not think that there is any difference across the House or between the Committee and the Government on the issue, but we would have had a clearer picture and been able to see what was in the Minister's mind.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 489 c1096
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Advertising Costs Insolvency Internet Newspaper press Publicity Local press Legislative reform orders London Gazette
- Legislation
- Legislative Reform (Insolvency) (Advertising Requirements) Order 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:19:22 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540725
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540725
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_540725