Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Miller (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 March 2009. It occurred during Legislative debate on Legislative Reform.


Legislative Reform

I have just been reflecting on my right hon. Friend's earlier comments; I apologise for going back a paragraph in his notes. He was talking about the narrow nature of the order and he has acknowledged that there will be another order. The hon. Member for Weston-super-Mare (John Penrose) made a perfectly reasonable point in asking why there could not have been a single order. If there had been, we would have had a clearer picture of the Government's strategy. I do not think that there is any difference across the House or between the Committee and the Government on the issue, but we would have had a clearer picture and been able to see what was in the Minister's mind.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
489 c1096 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Advertising Costs Insolvency Internet Newspaper press Publicity Local press Legislative reform orders London Gazette
Legislation
Legislative Reform (Insolvency) (Advertising Requirements) Order 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk