Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2009.


Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2009

Perhaps I may raise one other point that I forgot to cover in my opening remarks. On one high-profile pension, does the Minister share my regret, for this purpose anyway, that the Royal Bank of Scotland did not go bust, unlike so many of its customers, so that Sir Fred Goodwin's pension could be limited to £27,700 a year, as it would have been if he had been in the PPF? Although I do not necessarily expect the Minister to comment on that, does he accept that I believe that there is ample evidence to stop Sir Fred Goodwin's pension now, not least the shocking revelations in the Sunday Times and the Observer at the weekend about misuse of shareholders’ and savers’ funds by Sir Fred and bullying of non-executive directors? That pension should be challenged in the courts and stopped on the grounds of improper authorisation, negligence and, very probably, fraud.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
709 c174GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Fees and charges Eligibility Insolvency Workplace pensions Pensions Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Pension rights
Legislation
Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2009
Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk