Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009.
Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
This is such a complicated matter that on this occasion I would much prefer a letter. The first part of new regulation 69B—that is, paragraphs (1), (2) and (3)(a)—appear to have rather different connotations from (3)(b), (3)(c), (3)(d) and (4). My question was about comparing the two halves of 69B. I would be grateful for an explanation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c185GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Guaranteed minimum pensions Workplace pensions Pension rights
- Legislation
- Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:26:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541765
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541765
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541765