Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 March 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009.
Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
In short, the explanation may be that the first part deals with the requirements of provisions for survivors and the second part touches on the time frame in which they have to operate. Because they do not necessarily need to continue for ever, as I touched upon in assiduously reading my brief, there are circumstances that will trigger the cessation of those benefits for survivors—for example, someone remarrying after a certain age. I will be happy to write in more detail to the noble Lord if he thinks that would be helpful. Motion agreed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 709 c185GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Guaranteed minimum pensions Workplace pensions Pension rights
- Legislation
- Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:36:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541766
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541766
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_541766