Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Business Rate Supplements Bill.
Business Rate Supplements Bill
My Lords, I support the amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Jenkin of Roding, explained the position and the concerns very thoroughly. He emphasised the potential burden. The old Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform was certainly very hot on that, although one sometimes got the impression that there could be a burden if that department approved of it. We now have a Minister who is in the CLG and the new department so there should be some more joining up, and one hopes that the burden issue can be addressed very thoroughly. I have a particular question for the Minister, which I do not think will come as any surprise. In 2003, and no doubt before, the reason given for the exclusion of property owners was the difficulty of tracking them down. What has changed to enable property owners to be included as potential BID contributors in a formal rather than informal capacity with, one hopes, confidence on the part of the Government that there will not be this mechanical difficulty?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c960-1
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Ballots Costs Business Greater London Local government Rates and rating Property Business rates Small businesses Valuation Business improvement districts
- Legislation
- Business Rate Supplements Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:19:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567537
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567537
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_567537