Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 June 2009. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Overseas Companies Regulations 2009.


Overseas Companies Regulations 2009

My Lords, I join the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, in agreeing that the regulations are appropriate. Clearly, it makes enormous sense to simplify the procedure for registration of an overseas company, so that the company no longer has to take legal and accounting advice about the form of registration it requires. That lifts the regulatory and cost burden on overseas companies establishing places of business in the UK, which is welcome. I have only one technical question, on which I would welcome the Minister’s view. Clearly, what became known as Section 700 accounts were criticised by the company law review committee, and it is appropriate to move away from that. My question concerns the simplification of accounts procedures for non-European Union countries. They are straightforward in the EU because companies formed there comply with the accounting rules that have emerged by a series of directives, so it is clear what they will say. In the Government’s view, will the liberalisation—that may be the wrong noun, so let us say alteration—of the rules and the replacement of the Section 700 accounts make it marginally harder for creditors and people dealing with those companies to find out exactly what is happening or will it improve their position?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
711 c278GC 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Audit Company law Company accounts Companies Costs Finance EU law Foreign companies Northern Ireland
Legislation
Overseas Companies Regulations 2009
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk