Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Portsmouth (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 July 2009. It occurred during Debate on Lords of Appeal in Ordinary.


Lords of Appeal in Ordinary

My Lords, on behalf of these Benches I express my wholehearted support for this Motion of thanks. The noble and learned Lords have made their mark on this House, and that is to state the obvious. We on these Benches have found their companionship and their incisive contributions to this, yes, the high court of Parliament but perhaps not for much longer, congenial, constructive and, at times, appropriately challenging. Their presence here is very often an expression of deep moral courage. I cannot let this occasion pass without two further comments. When your Lordships came to vote on the legislation creating a Supreme Court, these Benches took some persuading that it was the right course of action; I say that not lightly, because I am hardly one of those Bishops who does not believe that anything should be tried for the first time. So that is another, constitutional, reason for wanting to underscore the full import of this Motion. Finally, these Benches have had a unique relationship with the Law Lords by virtue of reading Prayers before they sit and of witnessing their work afterwards. Believing, as I have always done, that God has a sense of humour, one of the consequences of these many judgment days is that Members of your Lordships’ House who may be, by temperament or conviction, a little reluctant to attend prayers are not unknown to come into the Chamber at the start of business in something of a hurry, unaware that Prayers have already been read. All power to our colleagues the Law Lords, as they continue their very important work in their new, elegant and less cramped premises. We shall miss them.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c1513-4 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Appeals House of Lords Judges Peers Supreme Court Appellate Committee
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk