Proceeding contribution from Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 December 2009. It occurred during Debate on European Financial Services Proposals.
European Financial Services Proposals
I cannot answer that question. I do not want to mislead the hon. Gentleman. It is my understanding that if we can get that as a Council decision, that will be what happens, but I will get back to him with the precise legal basis for that. The improved voting thresholds in the ESRB general board reflect a building consensus in Council that the voting mechanism for decisions taken by the ESRB's general board, as set out in the Commission's draft regulation, is not appropriate in all cases. Instead, there has been considerable support for voting by a two-thirds majority, rather than a simple majority, for adopting a recommendation and for agreeing to make a warning or recommendation public. As I said, there are outstanding issues and questions, but this is a positive agenda for reform, which the Government—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 501 c997
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Banks European Union Financial institutions European Parliament Financial markets EU action EU economic policy Regulation European Central Bank European Systemic Risk Board European Securities and Markets Authority European Banking Authority
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-08 16:41:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_598079
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_598079
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_598079