Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Todd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 December 2009. It occurred during Debate on European Financial Services Proposals.


European Financial Services Proposals

I burdened the House with quite a lengthy speech yesterday and I hope not to detain it quite so long today. There are some linkages, as I indicated in my earlier intervention on the Minister. First, we need to be grateful that Her Majesty's Opposition now regard a French banker as a useful resource for advice for their proposals on regulation, instead of an opportunity for rather stereotypical cursing. We can see some evidence of progress in policy formation there. The hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) challenged me on the possible payback that Mr. de Larosière might secure from his endorsement of Conservative policy, but we may have seen it in the hon. Gentleman's speech. Instead of questioning the architecture and philosophy of the regulation that came from the relevant group, the focus of his speech was on process and timing. I am certainly going to touch on those things, but I will also address some philosophical concerns about this approach and the direction in which we are heading.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
501 c1008 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Banks European Union Financial institutions European Parliament Financial markets EU action EU economic policy Regulation European Central Bank European Systemic Risk Board European Securities and Markets Authority European Banking Authority
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk