Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill [HL].


Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for her comments and am reassured by her statement that the Ministry of Defence will require information on an annual basis. That goes some way to meeting the concern behind this amendment. We hear that the Ministry of Defence has a very large number of information officers, although noble Lords here may know more than I do about that. Perhaps some of them could divert their activities from "information outwards" regarding the Ministry of Defence and its affairs to "information inwards" and collecting details about the remaining cluster bombs being held under permitted purposes. That suggestion may be regarded as unhelpful but I make it from the point of view of a layman in these affairs. With the satisfaction of the assurances from the Minister, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 4 withdrawn. Clause 20 agreed. Clauses 21 to 33 agreed. Clause 34 : Commencement and short title Amendment 5 Clause 34 : Commencement and short title Amendment 5 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c17GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Armed conflict Arms control Cluster munitions International cooperation Powers of entry Convention on Cluster Munitions
Legislation
Cluster Munitions (Prohibitions) Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk