Proceeding contribution from Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].
Digital Economy Bill [HL]
It has become apparent that the whole debate is really about the definition of the word "efficient". The problem, with the greatest respect to the Minister, is that the use of the word in this context is perhaps not the right one. It must be more efficient for me to go home by car, but it would be a lot cheaper to go on foot. The substitution of the word "efficient" for "profitable" or "economically viable" was, perhaps, wrong. Having listened to everything that has been said, I suspect that we are all singing from the same song sheet. I therefore beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 5 withdrawn. Amendments 6 and 7 not moved. Amendment 8 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 716 c176
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Devolved matters Broadcasting Broadcasting reception Broadband Communication Investment Infrastructure Northern Ireland Mergers Office of Fair Trading Political impartiality Public service broadcasting Ofcom Scotland Regulation Wales Rural areas
- Legislation
- Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:06:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_604848
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_604848
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_604848