Proceeding contribution from Peter Bone (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Canterbury City Council Bill.
Canterbury City Council Bill
On that last point, whatever we think about the individual Bills, the Nottingham City Council Bill, with all this talk of""surplus… applied to purposes connected with the improvement of the amenity of the city or any part of the city"" seems to be being used to raise money for the council rather than to regulate pedlars. It seems to be a money-raising exercise.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 503 c929
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Direct selling Canterbury City Council Licensing Local government Nottingham Nottingham City Council Touting Street trading Canterbury
- Legislation
- Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Nottingham City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:04:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609465
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609465
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609465