Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Freud (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 21 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.


Child Poverty Bill

I thank the noble Baroness. They were reluctant to endorse the use of the word "family". I accept the point of the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, that the Bill is not designed to capture the families of grown-up adults. Clearly, there was no intention to do so when I designed the amendment. If the amendment is inadequate, there is a way to capture the point, which is that we are looking at the child and parents as a unit. If that is of interest to the rest of the Committee, or even among the Government, I am prepared to come back at a later stage with an amendment that captures that concept. I would be willing to give way at this stage to the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, to learn her reaction to that proposition. I see the noble Baroness making a gesture. What a tragedy that we cannot have her words on paper at this point.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c220GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Children in care Accountability Disadvantaged Costs Fraud Employment Families Education Households Low incomes Ministerial responsibility Public appointments Poverty Public bodies Public consultation Lone parents Statistics Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Training Travellers Tax evasion Self-employed Child Poverty Commission
Legislation
Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk