Proceeding contribution from Tobias Ellwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 21 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords].
Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords]
I do not follow this argument at all. If my hon. Friend has got the area wrong in the amendment, it would require an Act of Parliament to change it. That cannot be right. The amendment would represent the nanny state and Westminster telling a local borough council how to conduct its affairs. He has missed off an area in Boscombe, which is part of my constituency, where pedlars are often found, and an area in Southbourne where there are shops and a village-type centre, so again pedlars would be denied. It does not make sense. We must let Bournemouth borough council operate the system in its area.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c513
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Bournemouth Licensing EU law Greater Manchester Local government Manchester City Council Touting Street trading Bournemouth Borough Council
- Legislation
- Bournemouth Borough Council Bill (HL) 2006-07 to 2009-10
- Manchester City Council Bill (HL) 2006-07 to 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 10:03:46 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_613707
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_613707
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_613707