Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Speaker in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Ambulance Response Times (Local Reporting).


Ambulance Response Times (Local Reporting)

I am grateful to the hon. and learned Gentleman for his point of order. My understanding is that under the Standing Orders the matter did not fall to be debated. What I can say to the hon. and learned Gentleman and, more widely, to the House is that the earlier Order Paper, of which he and others had sight and by which, therefore, inevitably, they were informed, was erroneous and the position was changed subsequently. [Interruption.] I am sure that the hon. Member for West Chelmsford (Mr. Burns) can understand the word "erroneous" and the concept embodied in it. [Interruption.] I need no further interruption from the hon. Gentleman, because I am responding to the point of order. The hon. and learned Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve) and others were guided by the old Order Paper; it was erroneous and was replaced by another. I do not know whether Secretary Straw wishes to respond to the point of order, but I feel sure that I am about to discover whether he does. If he wants to respond, he can. No, he is not going to do so. [Interruption.] Order. The hon. and learned Member for Beaconsfield has raised his point of order. He has put his point very forcefully on the record.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
504 c683-4 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Related items
Ambulance Response Times (Local Reporting)
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk