Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Leeds City Council Bill.


Leeds City Council Bill

If she had two milk trolleys stuck together and sought to peddle in the areas covered by these two Bills, she would not be able to claim that she was operating lawfully as a pedlar. If my hon. Friend had seen some of the pictures from the city centres in Leeds and Reading, he would understand why I accepted the amendments. The issue of permissible trolley size can be revisited in the other place, and I am sure that petitioners will attempt to make their lordships take a different view. I thought that the amendments to clause 5 of the Bills was a substantial step forward for pedlars' rights, compared with the highly restrictive regime that was originally included. That is why I accepted the amendments. The price that I have had to pay for doing so, on behalf of the pedlar community, is undertaking not to obstruct further the progress of the Bills through this House. I cannot give an undertaking on behalf of others, but I hope that my hon. Friend will respect that agreement so that these Bills receive a Third Reading. I hope that the reservations that he understandably still has can be resolved in the other place.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
504 c990 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Licensing Leeds Reading Borough Council Reading (Berkshire) Touting Street trading Leeds City Council
Legislation
Leeds City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
Reading Borough Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk