Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Leeds City Council Bill.
Leeds City Council Bill
My hon. Friend is making a powerful case in pointing out why the provisions relating to fixed penalties in the two Bills are unreasonable, oppressive and disproportionate. The good news is that the concerns relating to the fixed penalty provisions in the Bournemouth Borough Council Bill and the Manchester City Council Bill have been accepted by the promoters of those Bills, albeit late in the day. We can only hope that, when these two Bills get to the other place, their promoters will accept that these provisions should be removed. We could not have done what we did without tabling amendments. Having reached that agreement, however, I was unable to table amendments on Report because I might have been accused of delaying the progress of these two Bills.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c992
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Licensing Leeds Reading Borough Council Reading (Berkshire) Touting Street trading Leeds City Council
- Legislation
- Leeds City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Reading Borough Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:58:36 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_615980
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_615980
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_615980