Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Shahid Malik (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 29 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants Etc.) Bill.


Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants Etc.) Bill

I was going to make precisely the point that the Bill perhaps does not deal with a number of issues that could be addressed in Committee. One thing is clear: the core rationale behind the Bill is shared by all of us. My hon. Friend himself said that there was a clear, conscious decision to make the Bill as discrete as possible to ensure its progress. That does not mean, however, that other related matters pertaining to it cannot be dealt with in Committee. This time last year, the issue of unauthorised tenants affected by lender repossession action against their landlord was beginning to be drawn to public and media attention, for which I would like chiefly to thank the advice sector and organisations such as Shelter, Citizens Advice, Crisis and the Chartered Institute of Housing. I thank those organisations for the time that they spent working on ideas to address the issue, including in the joint report, "A private matter?" which was published in March 2009.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
504 c1040 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Fraud Housing Landlord and tenant Evictions Private sector Mortgages Rented housing Tenants' rights Repossession orders
Legislation
Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants etc) Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk