Proceeding contribution from Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Friday, 29 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants Etc.) Bill.
Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants Etc.) Bill
When those young families are thrown out, the local authority is required to provide emergency housing at a cost to the public purse, and the tenants will often have paid their rent using housing benefit money. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that there should be a charge on the owner of the property to refund that housing benefit money to the public purse, and to pay for the emergency housing costs? Why should the public purse pay for these crooks?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c1048
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Fraud Housing Landlord and tenant Evictions Private sector Mortgages Rented housing Tenants' rights Repossession orders
- Legislation
- Mortgage Repossessions (Protection of Tenants etc) Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:39:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_616905
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_616905
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_616905