Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Cairns (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Returning Officers (Accountability).


Returning Officers (Accountability)

I was not aware of that, although perhaps I should have been as an Islington council tax payer. I am afraid that nothing would surprise me about the Lib Dems on Islington council. They won the last election by only one seat and they now run the council on the basis of the mayor's casting vote, so they are not particularly good at winning elections. I am sure that my hon. Friend's comments will be reported to people in Islington. As I said, it is fairly obvious at the extremes of the argument what should be left to Parliament and what should be left to returning officers. However, in the light of the current controversy about election night, there is some debate about whether the timing of election counts falls within the jurisdiction of Parliament or returning officers. Is the timing of counts a practical and logistical issue and therefore squarely in the remit of returning officers, or is the issue one of democratic principle—the right of voters to find out as soon as possible who will govern them? I will come back to that in a moment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c74WH 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Accountability Elections Returning officers
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk