Proceeding contribution from David Cairns (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Returning Officers (Accountability).
Returning Officers (Accountability)
My hon. Friend is right. It is down to resources, and the importance and priority that councils attach to the function. My argument is that that state of affairs is inadequate in this day and age. Councils do not have the leeway to decide whether to prioritise education or social services. They must do so, because that is set out in statute, and they are inspected on those services, whereas in electoral services they are not inspected or, as I shall outline, adequately regulated. It is therefore up to each council whether to attach a priority to them as Sunderland and other councils do. The majority of councils simply do not attach priority to those services.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 505 c77WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Accountability Elections Returning officers
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:15:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_618676
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_618676
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_618676