Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Murphy (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 3 February 2010. It occurred during Question for short debate on Assisted Dying.


Assisted Dying

I am tired of these polarised debates, I have to say. It is time that we looked at ethical, societal and practical issues in a dispassionate way. I therefore strongly support an investigation along the lines proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Warner. Let us take, for example, the issue of mental competence. I think that noble Lords will agree that the decision to die requires the highest test to be satisfied. An inquiry would allow us to define in advance how the complexities of mental competence, depressive thinking and undue influence could be assessed properly in practice. Does it not make more sense to review mental competence and the influence of mental state before the event via a safeguarded law, as opposed to afterwards via an investigation of a mercy killing and a potential prosecution? I think so. As to those who quote Martin Amis, he is as serious about killing off older people as Jonathan Swift was about boiling babies.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c77GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Decriminalisation Inquiries Euthanasia Prosecutions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk