Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Bribery Bill [HL].


Bribery Bill [HL]

My Lords, before the House begins the Third Reading of the Bribery Bill, it may be helpful for me to say a few words about Third Reading amendments. The House has agreed a procedure for addressing amendments which, in the view of the Public Bill Office, fall outside the guidance in the Companion and the rules set by the Procedure Committee. In line with that procedure, the Public Bill Office advised the usual channels on Friday that some of the amendments on the Marshalled List for Third Reading today fall outside that guidance. On the basis of that advice, the usual channels have agreed to recommend to the House that Amendments 1, 2 and 5, in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Thomas of Gresford and Lord Goodhart, should not be moved. As ever, this is ultimately a matter for the House as a whole to decide. Clause 1 : Offences of bribing another person Clause 1 : Offences of bribing another person Amendments 1 and 2 not moved. Clause 10 : Consent to prosecution Amendment 3 Clause 10 : Consent to prosecution Amendment 3 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c481 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Courts Armed forces Corruption Intelligence services Ministerial powers National security Bribery
Legislation
Bribery Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk