Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Bribery Bill [HL].


Bribery Bill [HL]

The noble Lord’s remarks are pertinent, but I am sure he will instantly recognise that they cut both ways. If the necessary records are to some extent already being kept, it is not asking too much for the records that are required by the amendments to be kept. We as a country will hold our heads higher for being seen to have a system of control, even given what I entirely accept are the practical needs of the armed and security services to bribe, often on many occasions. Having supervision and control would raise our status, which is quite rightly very much part of the Government’s objective in the Bill. Keeping these records would not be an excessive requirement, because most of them are already kept. I very much hope that the Government will respond favourably to the thrust of the amendments and will put into place some such system, if not precisely this one.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c489 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Courts Armed forces Corruption Intelligence services Ministerial powers National security Bribery
Legislation
Bribery Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk