Proceeding contribution from Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Bribery Bill [HL].
Bribery Bill [HL]
Does the Minister feel able to address, even briefly, an argument that was advanced by the chairman of the Constitution Committee, the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, about the importance of prior authorisation in the event of individuals being subjected to jurisdictions overseas where the panoply of defences and arguments would not apply? Can he say—although he clearly has not followed what I have said—what he thinks is the virtue or otherwise of the arguments proposed by the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, about the possibility of a case arising against a member of the services in other jurisdictions?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c497-8
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal proceedings Courts Armed forces Corruption Intelligence services Ministerial powers National security Bribery
- Legislation
- Bribery Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:44:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620202
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620202
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620202