Proceeding contribution from Dan Norris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Seagulls (Gloucester).
Seagulls (Gloucester)
I hear clearly what my hon. Friend says, but my officials feel that we have a lot of information about the nature of gull behaviour. We still keep coming back to the factors of food source and places to roost. I do not know enough about the particular instance he cited to say whether that is applicable. If he could drop me a note, I will certainly look at the matter and talk to my officials. I will also ask them to consider the laser torch idea that he proposes, because that sounds as if it has some merit and should be given due consideration.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 505 c243WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Birds Companies Pollution Small businesses Research Urban areas Gloucester Seagulls
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:40:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620966
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620966
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_620966