Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Richard Shepherd (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on Privilege.


Privilege

I intervene very briefly in this debate to echo the remarks that my hon. Friend the Member for South Staffordshire (Sir Patrick Cormack) has just made. There is one thing that worries me about the process, because I can think of nothing more damaging to the reputation of an individual than to have a paper laid before this House with the words "Allegation of Contempt" on it. I take privilege very seriously, but like many Members I am not sure what it is about, what its ramifications or wider reaches are, or how it impacts on witnesses or those who take part in Select Committee proceedings. I am nervous about this case, in that there is no notification to witnesses or participants who come forward to assist a Committee in its deliberations that they might be at risk of offending against the privilege of the House by taking the actions that, in this case, Mr. Phillips took. That is my caveat about this case. We are talking about a very censorious process, if the participant or the affected witness is unaware of what privilege amounts to in such cases.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c171-2 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Equality and Human Rights Commission Parliamentary privilege Committee on Standards and Privileges Joint Committee on Human Rights Phillips, Trevor
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk