Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 23 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children, Schools and Families Bill.

Children, Schools and Families Bill

In what cases does the hon. Lady think it would be legitimate to place a statutory responsibility on various agencies to provide information to an LSCB? How would she address a situation in which a doctor chose not to co-operate with an LSCB—under their Hippocratic oath, or whatever—because they felt that there would otherwise be a breach of patient confidentiality? What penalty would she apply in such a situation, and how on earth would she impose it?

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 506 c194
Session: 2009-10
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Complaints Children Disclosure of information Accountability Corporal punishment Homosexuality Exemptions Faith schools Family courts Family law Judgements Family proceedings Protection Parents Pupils Media Offences against children Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Schools Witnesses Reviews Social work Local Government Ombudsman Teaching methods Haringey Doncaster Local safeguarding children boards Relationships and sex education
Legislation: Children, Schools and Families Bill 2009-10
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Children, Schools and Families Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools