Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 12 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Sunbeds (Regulation) Bill.


Sunbeds (Regulation) Bill

On the face of it, I would concede to my hon. Friend that there is a contradiction. When I come to discuss amendment 8, however, my hon. Friend will see that it takes the form of a probing amendment rather than one that I would wish to press to a vote. I hope to be able to come to that point quite quickly. I was saying to the Bill's promoter, the hon. Member for Cardiff, North, that there is an opportunity for compromise between reasonable people on this issue. At the age of 16, people are able to take key decisions relating to their personal health and well-being. In a sense, issues around sunbed exposure are relevant to personal health and well-being. People at that age are able to choose their doctor and their medical treatments; they can also choose which piercings they want, which tattoos, if any, and so on. The Electoral Commission produced a list of all the things that 16-year-olds could do. It seems to me that the opportunity for them to take responsibility on whether or not to go to a sun-tanning studio and expose themselves to artificial UV should be included on that list.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
507 c535 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Health hazards EU law Fines Health education Ionizing radiation Standards Young people Regulation Safety Skin cancer Sunbeds
Legislation
Sunbeds (Regulation) Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk