Proceeding contribution from Kelvin Hopkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 March 2010. It occurred during Opposition day on Equitable Life.
Equitable Life
The hon. Gentleman just said that the Government—whichever Government—must take account of the impact on the public purse of compensating Equitable Life's pensioners. Is that not a simple get-out for the Conservatives, and is there not very little difference between those on the Government Front Bench and the Conservative Front Bench on this? Is there not a moral obligation to pay the pensioners, whatever the cost to the public purse? It will not be in excess of the gross domestic product. But actually, if we collected a little more tax, we might be able to pay them quite easily.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c746
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Equitable Life Assurance Society
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:28:46 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631256
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631256
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631256