Proceeding contribution from Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Personal Care at Home Bill.
Personal Care at Home Bill
My Lords, I also strongly support this amendment. Like the noble Lord, Lord Low, I was unable to be here at the Committee stage because of other commitments. I just seek clarification from the Minister about reablement. The Bill says free provision is, ""conditional on the person undergoing a process designed to maximise the person’s ability to live independently"." I hope the Government are going to concede something in this area. Many of these people will have already had maximum independent living support prior to this Bill. I am concerned about what happens if somebody has a condition which is so severe that it is envisaged that no improvement can be made towards their independent living, or if they have already undergone a process, as part of their care management, which takes them to the maximum level. I hope we do not end up with the tokenism of some kind of reablement package.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c620
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Carers Costs Community care Hearing impairment Fees and charges Home care services Local government Local government finance Visual impairment Social services
- Legislation
- Personal Care at Home Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:19:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_632153
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_632153
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_632153