Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 March 2010. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Code of Practice for Interviews of Witnesses Notified by Accused) Order 2010.


Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Code of Practice for Interviews of Witnesses Notified by Accused) Order 2010

It is not a question that I can easily answer. My experience of defending, many years ago, was that sometimes it was a bit of a game as far as defence witnesses were concerned. Occasionally, you heard tales of defence witnesses being brought into court in the hope that their evidence would be over before the police had had the chance to check up on their previous convictions. It sometimes worked and sometimes it did not. To be honest, I think that most often it did not work. But the noble Lord has asked a good question. I may even have had references made in trials on the question of defence witnesses, but any judge would be extremely cautious in allowing in in the normal course of events any list that talked about potential defence witnesses. We will have to see how it works and this is one of the areas we will be monitoring. Motion agreed. Sitting suspended.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c291GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Criminal investigation Evidence Witnesses
Legislation
Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Code of Practice for Interviews of Witnesses Notified by Accused) Order 2010
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk