Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Graham Allen (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children, Schools and Families Bill.


Children, Schools and Families Bill

Before the hon. Gentleman moves away from PSHE, or life skills, does he accept that the absence of a mandatory aspect, which will be lost in this ludicrous wash-up process, will above all damage a particular group of children—not those who come from well-educated middle class homes, like those of many hon. Members present, but those who may come from a one-parent family or a deprived area and lack the social and emotional ability to make the best of themselves and the best, therefore, of their education at primary and secondary school? Does he accept that whoever is responsible and however it happened, that failure of all of us here to make life skills a mandatory part of the national curriculum will impact badly on constituencies such as the one that I represent, and no doubt on areas in his constituency too?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1229 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Personal, social, health and economic education Special educational needs Relationships and sex education
Legislation
Children, Schools and Families Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk