Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 25 May 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Dissolution of Parliament.


Dissolution of Parliament

No, as I have given way to the hon. Lady already. Secondly, not only does the party in power have an unfair advantage, but there is an inevitable period of uncertainty, especially towards the end of the fourth Session of a Parliament, about when Dissolution will happen. Dealing with those issues through having a fixed-term Parliament seems to me to be something that this Parliament ought to support. In addition to those undoubted benefits, our proposition would also reduce the complexity of electoral administration. We have a new regime of spending limits, and they are unnecessarily complex in the context of the moveable feast that is the present timing of an election. It would also allow the legislative programme to be planned more effectively—something dear to my heart and that of my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House—especially in the fourth and fifth Sessions. But none of those advantages— Motion lapsed (Standing Order No. 9(3)). Motion made, and Question proposed, That this House do now adjourn.—(Mr Goodwill.)


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
510 c148 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
House of Commons Fixed-term parliaments Dissolution Parliament Standards Royal prerogative Divisions Censure motions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk