Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 25 May 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Dissolution of Parliament.
Dissolution of Parliament
So be it—that is the point of parliamentary debate. However, there is no point whatever in having legislation on fixed-term Parliaments if there is no constitutional lock. Otherwise it will become a meaningless piece of legislation. I know of no legislation in any country that provides for fixed-term Parliaments that does not provide some form of constitutional lock—some form of entrenchment—in order to ensure that the legislation is not cast aside at the whim of the Executive. That would seem to return to the position in which the Executive had the power and Parliament was deprived of it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 510 c151
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- House of Commons Fixed-term parliaments Dissolution Parliament Standards Royal prerogative Divisions Censure motions
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:40:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_641899
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_641899
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_641899