Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from John Hayes (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 June 2010. It occurred during Debate on Building a High-Skilled Economy.


Building a High-Skilled Economy

I want to make progress; I will give way later. The hon. Gentleman has had one turn, and although I am generous, my generosity is not without limit. I want now to focus on the highly centralised and bureaucratic system that developed under the previous Government, whereby funds that could have been used on teaching and training were actually used detailing plans, complying with targets and formulating schemes. Instead of enabling colleges and other providers to respond to the needs of businesses and learners, Ministers thought they knew what was best. Excessive bureaucracy sapped precious energy from our education system. If I might, as a primer, offer advice again, particularly to newer Members, that if proof were needed of that assertion, it is to be found in the report commissioned as early as 2005 by the last Government under the auspices of Sir Andrew Foster. That report concluded that there was a "galaxy" of oversight, inspection and administration in the FE sector, and called for precisely the kind of streamlined and more responsive structure that we in this Government will now put in place. Even worse, though, that centralised, target-driven micro-management led to a systemic failure in the form of an FE capital funding crisis from which the sector is still reeling. Members will know that the Learning and Skills Council encouraged bids that would have cost 10 times more than the available funds. Across the country, 144 capital bids were frozen. Members across the Chamber came to the House to complain about the circumstances in their localities and the effects on their local colleges, and rightly so. Seventy-nine of those projects had already received agreement in principle. Many colleges incurred considerable cost. Andrew Foster was once again brought out of mothballs by the Government to produce another report, and he made it very clear that a top-heavy, bureaucratic system had failed. He concluded that the LSC was too slow to respond—""there were straws in the wind, early storm warnings, but the problem was not crystallised fast enough."" So we will look closely at FE capital. Next week, I shall make it clear how we will spend on a bid basis with colleges the extra £50 million that the Chancellor has agreed to devote to FE capital projects.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
511 c1073 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Business Competition Adult education Economic situation Skilled workers Economic recession
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk