Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 June 2010. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords Reform.


House of Lords Reform

My Lords, I said at the beginning that I would listen to the debate. I have been encouraged by the strong support for my Motion. Therefore, I propose to move it without making another speech but I will simply clarify two things. Contrary to what the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, said, the Motion is not an alternative to the resolution of the noble Lord, Lord Strathclyde; it is a precursor to it. It is clear that the course on which the Government are embarked will take at least the five years of this Parliament. We need running repairs now. If the four separate resolutions are passed—I stress to my noble friend Lord Caithness that they are separate and might not all be passed—there is no reason why draft or full legislation could not be introduced in the autumn. Three of the points are already in legislative form from the previous Government. Therefore, the legislation could go through during this Session and we could achieve the running repairs which this House so badly needs. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
719 c1785-6 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crime By-elections House of Lords Disqualification Hereditary peers House of Lords composition Public appointments Peers Reform Retirement
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk