Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 June 2010. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords Reform.
House of Lords Reform
But it is not a government Bill. It has been introduced several times and found to have enormous flaws. A responsible Government would have to ask a parliamentary draftsman to draft a measure. The noble Lord with his government experience knows this. We would need to do that at the earliest opportunity. We are going to fast track this. It could not be published before October or November. That is just a few weeks before we will publish our own Bill. I do not think that I could go to the committee of parliamentary business managers and say that the House of Lords wants an advantage of just a few weeks to discuss in government time the Bill of the noble Lord, Lord Steel. With the best will in the world, that is not going to happen. All that I will say is that it has been a tremendous debate. I am glad that I have been able to answer the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Steel of Aikwood. He has been very patient for a number of years. Now we are asking him to be patient for a few more months and he will get everything that he wants and probably deserves.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 719 c1787-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crime By-elections House of Lords Disqualification Hereditary peers House of Lords composition Public appointments Peers Reform Retirement
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:04:08 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_650173
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_650173
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_650173