Proceeding contribution from Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 July 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Canterbury City Council Bill.
Canterbury City Council Bill
I was taken aback by the point that the Minister made about the services directive. I was a Member of the European Parliament when that went through, and we had hours of debate on it. It is one of the bizarre European examples of the law of unforeseen consequences that it should have some bearing on what local authorities do when it comes to allowing pedlars to trade on their streets. When the European Scrutiny Committee looked at the services directive—it wrote a long report on it—did it consider that point? What other unforeseen consequences might flow from that directive?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c134
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Canterbury City Council Licensing EU law Leeds Local government Nottingham Nottingham City Council Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Street trading Canterbury
- Legislation
- Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Nottingham City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:27:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999