Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 July 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Canterbury City Council Bill.


Canterbury City Council Bill

I was taken aback by the point that the Minister made about the services directive. I was a Member of the European Parliament when that went through, and we had hours of debate on it. It is one of the bizarre European examples of the law of unforeseen consequences that it should have some bearing on what local authorities do when it comes to allowing pedlars to trade on their streets. When the European Scrutiny Committee looked at the services directive—it wrote a long report on it—did it consider that point? What other unforeseen consequences might flow from that directive?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
513 c134 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Canterbury City Council Licensing EU law Leeds Local government Nottingham Nottingham City Council Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Street trading Canterbury
Legislation
Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
Nottingham City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk