Proceeding contribution from Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 July 2010. It occurred during Legislative debate on Canterbury City Council Bill.
Canterbury City Council Bill
The hon. Gentleman will know that the procedures for private Bills are unique and somewhat different from those for many other types of legislation. That is why the Government do not normally comment on either the content or the process of private Bills; equally, as the hon. Member for Christchurch (Mr Chope) said, it is why special provision is made for private Bills to continue from one Parliament to the next. I do not know how long that has been the position in our Standing Orders, but it is relatively traditional—it might not be as long a tradition as pedlary, but nevertheless it is not something that we should discard with undue haste. I want to thank the House for this opportunity to outline the Government's position on these important matters, and I look forward to future debates.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c135-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Canterbury City Council Licensing EU law Leeds Local government Nottingham Nottingham City Council Reading (Berkshire) Regulation Street trading Canterbury
- Legislation
- Canterbury City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Nottingham City Council Bill 2007-08 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:06:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_652006
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_652006
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_652006