Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on Defendant Anonymity.


Defendant Anonymity

The strongest argument is around the balance of harms. The complainant in a rape trial has anonymity, and everyone who has considered this issue in the past has come to a balanced judgment that it is therefore appropriate to give the defendant a degree of anonymity. Because of the way in which rape is reported, these will have been the considerations that have guided previous Governments and Oppositions, and previous parliamentarians, in their consideration of this issue.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
513 c559 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Rape Trials Victims Rights of accused
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk