Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on Defendant Anonymity.
Defendant Anonymity
The strongest argument is around the balance of harms. The complainant in a rape trial has anonymity, and everyone who has considered this issue in the past has come to a balanced judgment that it is therefore appropriate to give the defendant a degree of anonymity. Because of the way in which rape is reported, these will have been the considerations that have guided previous Governments and Oppositions, and previous parliamentarians, in their consideration of this issue.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 513 c559
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Rape Trials Victims Rights of accused
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:49:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654087
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654087
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_654087